Considering live updates
I think the guidelines suggest using approvals on failure, especially if sandboxing is an issue. If the CLI can’t support network access, asking the user is a good idea. Should I check if they want a live update or a general analysis? I might say something like, "Right now, City is leading but facing pressure from Arsenal or Liverpool." But, it feels a bit speculative, so I should definitely ask if they want the latest standings and what specifics they’re interested in.Clarifying user options
I need to ask a follow-up question to the user: Would they prefer a real-time table or a sample write-up template? It might be a good idea to propose setting up a small script to fetch standings from an API. But, with the need for network access and API keys, it’s not ideal. I should clarify my questions. I can offer to fetch the latest standings if they approve, or write a neutral analysis piece without relying on exact numbers.Crafting response options
I should clarify the user's needs, especially since they’re interested in Simplified Chinese, which likely means they’re referring to Mainland China. I can offer to fetch live data and provide quick template options along with a more detailed paragraph using conditional language. It’s important to keep my response concise, friendly, and organized, perhaps labeling the options as 1, 2, or 3. There’s no need to use shell commands at this point. Let’s get started on crafting those options!
你是想看最新的英超积分榜，还是要一段快讯/解读文案？
可选项：
先给你几条现成文案示例（不含具体分差，随时可发）：
标题：英超积分榜更新：曼城领跑但压力陡增 导语：最新一轮战罢，曼城继续占据榜首，但身后追兵状态火热，领先优势被不断侵蚀。接下来数轮强强对话将直接影响争冠走向。
标题：榜首悬念升级！曼城优势收窄 导语：随着竞争对手持续抢分，曼城在积分榜的安全垫被削薄。赛程强度上升与人员轮换将成为蓝月关键考题。
标题：争冠白热化，曼城感受逼近步伐 导语：多支球队保持高效率输出，榜首之争进入细微差距博弈。净胜球与直接对话或成决定因素。
需要我现在抓取最新积分榜并用具体数据改写上述文案吗？如果需要，回复“1”。
